Monday, November 30, 2009

Obama is the worse possible president

Obama is the worse possible president

1) He doubts USA right to lead the world, but not his

2) He is ashamed of our success, but not his own

3) He thinks the constitution is seriously flawed, but he took an oath to defend it

4) He believes in wealth redistribution. but not charitable donations which he would tax

5) He is to...tally confused about religion and faith, Says we are not a Christian nation, and are a large Islamic nation.

6) He doesn't love us, he calls us "THEM" and "THOSE PEOPLE"

7) He dosnt understand OR LIKE capitalism as he buys auto companies, cash for clunkers and other idiot moves.

8) He accuses "RICH" of not doing their share, yet Warren Buffet, George Soros and Bill Gates have $100 billion between them, he isn't asking for that money.

9) He isn't all that concerned with the truth

10) He has no internal convictions and waffles on almost everything including FOX news.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Cognitive Dissonance or Group Think: how to understand GROUP THINK and WIN with that knowledge

As a member of the Conservative group I want my group to succeed, this means working hard to understand what groups are and trying to have that knowledge work for my group to make the Sarah Palin doctrine a reality.


cognitive dissonance

I'm dropping this in here because it is the liberal most popular way to explain your failing to believe the CORRECT things. I hate the progressive tactic of coming up with some bleak term for your group and explaining why you can believe what they think is unbelievable. So Jonesville and Heaven's gate and CONSERVATISM is explained with this term cognitive dissonance -- therapy jargon for not wanting to see what I didn't want to see. They needed this explanation because they had a hard time explaining away smart conservatives. Mostly they will convince you there are not too many smart conservatives. But if you come up with one like Chaney or Newt Gingrich they need a way to explain it. they have cognitive dissonance to explain this, smart conservatives just don't process all the facts. They selectively eliminate any contrarian beliefs, thus they are still smart but don't use all the facts. This probably happens without their conscious intervention.

This is a flaw in their DNA, Or has something to do with watching FOX news which carefully edits what you are allowed to hear.

Bush is stupid, (but he flew a jet and had better grades than John Kerry), Palin is stupid (but she ran a town and a state.)

First we are accused of being stupid and if those simple accusations of STUPID don't work , meaning the citizens don't buy it, then they play the cognitive dissonance, and walk away with a big win. IN THEIR MIND.

It is more or less agreed that these are the eight aspects of GROUP THINK

1. Illusion of invulnerability –Creates excessive optimism that encourages taking extreme risks.

2. Collective rationalization – Members discount warnings and do not reconsider their assumptions.

3. Belief in inherent morality – Members believe in the rightness of their cause and therefore
ignore the ethical or moral consequences of their decisions.

4. Stereotyped views of out-groups – Negative views of “enemy” make effective responses to
conflict seem unnecessary.

5. Direct pressure on dissenters – Members are under pressure not to express arguments
against any of the group’s views.

6. Self-censorship – Doubts and deviations from the perceived group consensus are not expressed.

7. Illusion of unanimity – The majority view and judgments are assumed to be unanimous.

8. Self-appointed ‘mindguards’ – Members protect the group and the leader from information
that is problematic or contradictory to the group’s cohesiveness, view, and/or decisions.

(Sound like Climate Research Unit at

There is one point not made here, I might add
9) Often ridicule and persecute members of other groups.

Which isn't in the Psychologist list of 8 aspects.

If you apply this to Heavens Gate, Jonesville, Nazism or other GROUP THINK large or small you will see this is a pretty accurate depiction of those human endeavors which I refer to as GROUPING. Grouping is evident in all kinds of mans experiences as juvenile as to whether you prefer Pepsi or Coke or as profound as whether you are Capitalists or Communists. Obviously, there is the ability to join numerous groups over many venues. It would be schizophrenic to be both a Capitalist and a communist so these human beings don't exist mostly.

Now a Pepsi groupie may not persecute a Coke groupie but he will be confused and frustrated why the Code guy doesn't "GET" it. So obviously groupings have different levels of importance to the groupies. But it escalates to life and death struggle pretty easily such as soccer game riots.

Need I mention Islamic radicals?

The interesting point would be that it doesn't seem to matter how accurate or how momentous the beliefs are. The intensity is more a matter of the enthusiasm of the groupies. This might be because of some charismatic leader or of some cascading of grouping. For example, A Chicago, Illinois White Sox baseball fan has groups of Favorite sport, home state, and City all reinforcing the other.

Conservatives need to understand that the elitists with Harvard educations and equivalencies do belong to a group that know you are not capable of making your own decisions, and certainly not decisions effecting the country. They will say things like "people should have to be educated before they can vote". They have absolutely no understanding that your vote can legitimately be cast in your own self interest. They have a concept that they belong to a group that is dedicated to a greater cause than self interest.

If you run conservation, global warming, socialism and communism through the test of the 8 aspects of "group think" you will see that they meet all the criteria as well as cognitive dissonance. It is especially true of the Higher Moral standing and other egocentric attributes of these groups.


The only useful strategy is to ignore DIRECT debate as a useful tactic, cognitive dissonance makes that non feasible, no one will change their mind and we do not have time to deprogram 23 million progressives and rehabilitate them. One on one debate is a time losing proposition, you can see that on news programs where everyone "shouts out" their "talking points", I never see anyone say "Yeah I didn't think of that your right!". The best way is to actually discredit what an opposing group believes in. Take the Global Warmist groupies for example. You have a few leaders and millions of followers. If you can discredit the leaders you will chunk off a lot of followers, after all winning is an important part of the grouping psychology, and if you are raising the chances of failure you will start seeing the groupies drop off.

So along comes the Climate Research Unit of Anglia hack. A dozen or so Scientists are brought up for scrutiny. Did they control peer review to suppress dissenting opinions. Did they falsify or hide data. Did they conspire to change data and "trick" programs? Maybe they did and maybe they didn't. The point is that they are discredited in some people minds, and people who were in the group might see it sinking and resign membership.

The truth of the emails doesn't necessarily determine the impact, it's the believability, That's why we start to see all sorts of fabrications and lies, because even tho we may be subject to cognitive dissonance there may be an opportunity to pick off some group members with stories of corruption, sexual misconduct, animal cruelty and so on because these resonate with individuals more than their group affiliations. I would caution conservatives that dirty tricks is not a good way to build an enduring group, and I do not recommend it.

It would be like finding an original Quran that said love the infidels as you love God. The people who really had to hate infidels would need a new group, at the least we would have a schism. A Schism is a good thing for the opposing group because it cuts the size of the opposing groups. More often than not, especially in a representative democracy a larger group is a more powerful group. Resolutely preaching tenets to those who haven't yet chosen a group is an effective way to grow your group, there is no better forum than schools to do this. Ask Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Castro. Another effective means to shrink the opposing group is to kill them Ask Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Castro.

So am I really going to propose a solution or am I going to just keep rambling on?


"Owe no one anything except to love one another, for he who loves another has fulfilled the law. For the commandments, 'You shall not commit adultery, You shall not murder, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, You shall not covet,' and if there is any other commandment, are all summed up in this saying, namely, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' Love does no harm to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law" (Romans 13:8-10).

" 'My son,' the father said, 'you are always with me, and everything I have is yours. But we had to celebrate and be glad, because this brother of yours was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.'

– (Luke 15:31-32, NIV)

Can you love a liberal or progressive? Probably not, but you can want to love them as a Christian "We want to love you, return to the fold". This is easily mumbled quickly into "We love you, return to the fold".

The Rise of Christianity

by Rodney Stark - published by Princeton University Press, 1996

"Christianity recognized women as equal to men, children of God with the same supernatural destiny. Moreover the Christian moral code of prohibition against polygamy, divorce, birth control, abortion, infanticide, etc. contributed to the well-being of women, changing their status from powerless serfs in bondage to men, to women with dignity and rights in both the Church and the State.

Why did Christianity grow then? According to Stark, "It grew because Christians constituted an intense community, able to generate the 'invincible obstinacy' that so offended the younger Pliny but yielded immense religious rewards. And the primary means of its growth was through the united and motivated efforts of the growing numbers of Christian believers, who invited their friends, relatives, and neighbors to share the 'good news'." At the heart of this willingness to share one's faith was doctrine, that which was to be believed. "Central doctrines of Christianity prompted and sustained attractive, liberating, and effective social relations and organization." The chief doctrine, of course, which was radically new to a pagan world groaning under a host of miseries and saturated with capricious cruelty and the vicarious love of death, was that "because God loves humanity, Christians may not please God unless they love one another."
To build a post-millennial "civilization of love and truth," it would seem imperative that we continue to study how it was done, or begun, the first time around by our "role models", the first Christians, with such splendid results.

So am I proposing a religious movement? No not at all. I am presenting to you one of the most successful and self expanding groups of all time. I gave a small glimpse of why it was successful. I tell you with certainty that this movement about Dignity of spirit and man himself, about love and self love, individual freedoms and rights are spelled out in glorious simplicity above left in the five commandments for man. This is a blue print for a thriving rational society. A "as good as it gets" social engineering model. The five commandments about MAN loves MAN.

I believe the five commandments about God are optional. But to have a reasonable functioning society the law is based on the five commandments for man it always has been. We are whittling away till we think adultery is maybe enough fun that it is OK. But maybe the evidence in our world of our crumbling societies should get us to re-think the whittling away. I don't see things improving.

I think they, liberals and progressives ridicule our God, challenge us to prove the unprovable, say we dis avow science, use that as a leverage to abuse our intelligence. And I am saying to you, my relationship with God can be a private thing, and should be of no concern to them.

We need not explain the five commandments of MAN, they are self evident.

FIVE: 'Honor your father and your mother.'
SIX: 'You shall not murder.'
SEVEN: 'You shall not commit adultery.'
EIGHT: 'You shall not steal.'
NINE: 'You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.'
TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.'

1) Respect our senior citizens
2) Respect life
3) Respect Family values
4) Do not take another's property
5) Respect the rights of others, including their reputation

These are 4000 year old principles established before Christianity.

It could well serve us again to explain our conservative beliefs and our belief we can not protect our freedoms without a moral people and a moral body of representation.
John Adams in a speech to the military in 1798 warned his fellow countrymen stating, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams is a signer of the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and our second President.

Benjamin Rush, Signer of the Declaration of Independence said. "[T]he only foundation for a useful education in a republic is to be aid in religion. Without this there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments. Without religion, I believe that learning does real mischief to the morals and principles of mankind."

Noah Webster, author of the first American Speller and the first Dictionary said, "[T]he Christian religion, in its purity, is the basis, or rather the source of all genuine freedom in government. . . . and I am persuaded that no civil government of a republican form can exist and be durable in which the principles of that religion have not a controlling influence."

Gouverneur Morris, Penman and Signer of the Constitution. "[F]or avoiding the extremes of despotism or anarchy . . . the only ground of hope must be on the morals of the people. I believe that religion is the only solid base of morals and that morals are the only possible support of free governments. [T]herefore education should teach the precepts of religion and the duties of man towards God."

Fisher Ames author of the final wording for the First Amendment wrote, "[Why] should not the Bible regain the place it once held as a school book? Its morals are pure, its examples captivating and noble. The reverence for the Sacred Book that is thus early impressed lasts long; and probably if not impressed in infancy, never takes firm hold of the mind."

John Jay, Original Chief-Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court , "The Bible is the best of all books, for it is the word of God and teaches us the way to be happy in this world and in the next. Continue therefore to read it and to regulate your life by its precepts."

James Wilson, Signer of the Constitution; U. S. Supreme Court Justice, "Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants. Indeed, these two sciences run into each other."

Noah Webster, author of the first American Speller and the first Dictionary stated, "The moral principles and precepts contained in the scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitutions and laws. . . All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war, proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible."

Robert Winthrop, Speaker of the U. S. House, "Men, in a word, must necessarily be controlled either by a power within them or by a power without them; either by the Word of God or by the strong arm of man; either by the Bible or by the bayonet."

George Washington, General of the Revolutionary Army, president of the Constitutional Convention, First President of the United States of America, Father of our nation, " Religion and morality are the essential pillars of civil society."

Benjamin Franklin, Signer of the Declaration of Independence "[O]nly a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."

"Whereas true religion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness . . . it is hereby earnestly recommended to the several States to take the most effectual measures for the encouragement thereof." Continental Congress, 1778
There Is No Freedom Without Moral Responsibility


Metropolitan Kirill of Smolensk and Kaliningrad
The chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate Department for External Church Relations answers questions from the 'Literaturnaya gazeta' weekly, November 2-8, 2005
From The Times
June 26, 2009
Credo: Without a shared moral code there can be no freedom in our society
When it comes to personal behaviour we have now come to believe that there is no right and wrong. Instead, there are choices.
Jonathan Sacks

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Another Look at the Psychology of Our Politics

Another Look at the Psychology of Our Politics
By: Dominic J. Melfi

"WE WIN, THEY LOSE." ` Sarah Palin

A plan for WE WIN

Earlier we discussed the Grouping aspect of our nature. This discussion uses the facts from that to make a further jump. The Demoralization of some 30 million Americans.

I am often bent to wonder about the vehemence and acidity in the rhetoric in our politics. At the leadership Level, Pelosi calls us Astroturfers, a perceived insult that indicates we are less than blue blooded honest Citizens.

Harry Reid says we are Evil Mongers. Obama stops his mopping to call us "THEM" and "THOSE WHO MADE THE MESS", like it was a pile of dog poop we dropped in front of HIM.

No mention of Barney Franks and Maxine Waters and Dodd who were the Architects of the financial crisis.

Yuri Bezmenov was a KGB defector in the 1960's. He warned that our institutions were being infiltrated by communist's teachings with no opposing teaching of USA principles. He Says

Exposure to real information means nothing to these fully demoralized USA citizens. He mentions Jane Fonda as an example. He says there is no way to show them anything. He said MAYBE if they got a Soviet military boot up the back end they might see the light. Yuri says the elitist are thoroughly indoctrinated and propagandized. He says takes about 30 years to demoralize a country. In his sense demoralization means when you teach an individual to abandon the historical traditional beliefs of his country and accept the Lenin Marxists ideologies. Remember he was speaking around 1980 or so, so there is another 25 years of demoralization since then,

White House interim communications director Anita Dunn calling Mao Zedong one of her “favorite political philosophers.”

White House adviser Communist Van Jones said he would use the green movement to transform capitalism into something else.

Barack Hussein Obama, "redistributing wealth is a good thing"

Michelle Obama "First time in my life I've been proud of America"...Even tho her Husband was a US Senator

Yuri Bezmenov:

Our local Conservative Talk Show host Vicki McKenna admits she was brainwashed to be a communist in College, University of Wisconsin I believe. I'm not sure what epiphany saved her from the brink but she needed to "Clean herself up". She is 41 or so, same genre as Obama. We know Obama has written his chosen associates were communist professors.

Stay with me. The point is, the heartland and bible clutching gun clutching average Citizen hasn't had this brain washing demoralization take place. That's why we can still see the positives about USA and they can't. Certain numbers of Citizens are groupies and will follow the President and authority no matter what. A certain number of Citizens are so dependent on entitlements that they will follow the perceived purveyors of these handouts into the brink blindly. They define this country as the check in the mail.

WE CAN TOTALLY IGNORE THE LESS THAN 30MILLION voters who are demoralized, they are not worth our effort, Union workers, members minorities who are blindly following progressive leaders. IGNORE THEM. They can find us, we are not looking for them because they are brainwashed and we don't have time or resources to deprogram them.

The social programs that seniors are dependent on have stripped seniors of their savings and in many cases put them into a dependency on the state, as was the PLAN. For most of our lives we have paid in 17% into social security (8.5 employer and 8.5% worker FICA) then an additional 2.9% for medicare and 3% or more for workman's compensation at state levels and you are close to 25% paid into entitlement programs.

If I had control of that money I would probably have 2.5 Million Now.

Just think 25% of your lifetime earnings with a reasonable compounded return over 40+ years.

So for most middle class Senior Citizens we are not standing around with our hands out, we just want a reasonable return for these taxes and our cheating lying government cant do it. They have stolen our wealth in the name of their entitlements.

The progressives can not directly address these issues. They know there is some ultimate time that the government will own everything and they can get it right. Their current excuse is their plan isn't "complete".

There are probably about 2 million citizens driving the demoralization of USA. There are 15million union members who will follow the union bosses, mostly public employees. About 10 million adult minorities who will vote democratic almost automatically because they think the dems "look Out" for them.

That is 27 million that you cant touch or make any sense to.

131 million voters in 2008.

27 million Demoralized Citizens, they may not be socialist/communists but they are committed to the Unions or the entitlements or they are the Elitists like Obama who hate the USA, They are irrevocable groupies in the genre of Jonesville and Heavens Gate.
(Blog on joining groups) (Stats on party affiliation)

These are polls not registrations

36% Democrat
23% Republican
40% Independent

Let me point out that in 2004 Republicans were 30%. I postulate that polls would be up for party in power and down for that out of power just because Citizens want to be with the winner. But these are the best numbers I can find so we will use them.

52.4 Million Independents (40% of 131) who swing to the most convincing argument each election.
30.1 Million republicans (who don't always vote republican)
47.1 Million Democrats (of which 23 million are totally demoralized)

When you look at Party affiliation you have a real problem with republicans winning elections, they need a real boost from Independents.

But if we look at stats from Ideology point of view

37% Conservative 48.5 Million
36% Moderate 47.1 Million
19% Liberal 24.9 Million (this is close to our estimate of 23 million demoralized Citizens)

When you look at Ideology you would suppose a conservative can easily win every election. Our mission should be clear. Define the Liberal Progressive candidates as RADICAL liberals, push that concept incessantly.

Define the Conservative candidate as a Strong conservative with a tinge of moderation. No compassionate conservative Bush wore that out. But a strong Constitutionalist who wants a good safety net for underprivileged, with a road out of welfare for each individual.

2) THE SECOND THING IS TO GET SENIOR CITIZENS TO VOTE FOR A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE, Drive them to the polls, register them. We probably have 10 million seniors we can bring to the polls.

In case you doubt the demoralization of USA Citizens.

I just heard an interesting sound clip from KSM's Defense Counsel. The graduate of Harvard and the US AirForce Academy says, and I roughly quote:

"If these men have only a moment to stand up to the US Government's propaganda, I'll say 'its about time. It will be worth it' .... These men are not terrorists."

This is a USA citizen. So get it right, they are Demoralized and are not Patriots in any sense we understand it. They have a allegiance to a country that they VISUALIZE, not the USA we know and love,

Be True

Monday, November 23, 2009

The Climate Research Unit Anglia TRICK hack and other oddities

Media Matters a Progressive blog dedicated to answering "Conservative Disinformation" says:

"It does look incriminating on the surface, but there are lots of single sentences that taken out of context can appear incriminating. ... You can't tell what they are talking about. Scientists say 'trick' not just to mean deception. They mean it as a clever way of doing something - a short cut can be a trick."

AND OF COURSE this may be true.

Prostitutes use the word TRICK to and it dosnt mean deception it means a clever way of doing something,,,

Card Players use the word TRICK to mean winning a round most card players hide their cards as well and play for money.

Then there's the old HAT TRICK where a hockey player shoves a puck up your goal three times.

So when is trick a trick is is is.

Got me

but this slows down Global Warming A LOT and saves the citizens from Copenhagen I think.

ALL the debate is split down ideological lines, the progressives are wheeling out all their semantic skills to explain to us what context the word

"Dishonest Club"

was used to mean a club of men with high integrity, while the conservatives think words mean the same as they did when the fore founders said

"You have no enduring Freedom without a moral people"
all of this is meaningless. The real meaning is Copenhagen probably will not happen and the sovereignty of the USA will not be subjugated to a international tribunal.

I believe these scientist believe in global warming, I don't believe they have proven it. They want to save the world which is a very noble objective indeed, Saving the world then becomes the activity of choice, not the science.

That's a political and mystical ideology not a scientific endeavor.

Unfortunately scientists arnt allowed to have causes, only facts. You cant manipulate the facts to support your causes.

They may be right but they couldn't wait for proof. They had to act.

The truth is there is a conspiracy to save us from our ignorance about global warming, in this case the truth of the conspiracy may destroy the world if it is the truth the global warming is man made.

Bottom line is no one has proved anything about global warming.

We have only proved man can subscribe to concepts such as Jonesville, Heavens Gate, Eugenics, Global Warming with alarming predictability. If we kill people at soccer games riots GROUP THINK must be part of the DNA.


Saturday, November 14, 2009

Look at the ways of men

It is really pretty simple when you figure it out. And it isn't hard to figure out. We examine Ants and Bees and Wolf Packs and other social animals and seem to be able to make some legitimate observations. When Ants Attack: Chemicals That Trigger Aggression In Argentine Ants Synthesized

ScienceDaily (Oct. 29, 2009) — Experiments led by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, have demonstrated that normally friendly ants can turn against each other by exploiting the chemical cues they use to distinguish colony-mates from rivals,

There are many examples in nature of the Social Group and how it works. This is a method for survival for some species. Man studies other species and find behavior to be controlled by chemicals and other bio-chemical triggers. We talk about testosterone in males for aggressiveness ans "HAIR" or "MALENESS" and other sorts of things. Now maybe in the psychology labs some one talks about these things.

The truth is most of the controversy we are embroiled in can be brought down to a consideration of man's overwhelming tendencies. These tendencies are to GROUP under a cause or banner. In that sense Face Book is an ideal exploitation of man's nature.

Again in an attempt to keep this simple, I present a number of examples of the group principle ranging from Spanish Inquisition, witch burning in Salem to Soccer games around the world. There are groups who infect harm on others, groups who inflict harm on themselves.

GROUPING together is a natural tendency of the human species. Even though we pride ourselves as intelligent beings, it doesn't seem like validity or deep rational thought is required in this process. ONLY PERCEIVED SELF INTEREST or the defense of our CAUSE.

Now here is USA we have a schism of political beliefs and everyone is arguing the merits of progressive ideology against conservatism.

It seems we are going to become a "FAN" of something just by our nature.

What are the fundamental switching points?

1) Religion
2) Family values
3) Education
4) Unions
5) Career
6) Needs
7) Desires


Then after they had danced the papas [Aztec priests] laid them down on their backs on some narrow stones of sacrifice and, cutting open their chests, drew out their palpitating hearts which they offered to the idols before them."

Cort├ęs and his men were the only Europeans to see the human sacrifices of the Aztecs, for the practice ended shortly after the successful Spanish conquest of the Aztec empire. But since the sixteenth century, Aztec sacrifice has persisted in puzzling scholars. No human society known to history approached that of the Aztecs in the quantities of people offered as religious sacrifices: 20,000 a year is a common estimate.
Port Kaituma Airstrip shootings
Main article: Jonestown

As members of Ryan's delegation boarded two planes at the airstrip, Jones' "Red Brigade" armed guards arrived in a tractor-pulled trailer and began shooting at the delegation. The guards killed Congressman Ryan and four others near a twin engine Otter aircraft. At the same time, one of the supposed defectors, Larry Layton, drew a weapon and began firing on members of the party that had already boarded a small Cessna.[88] An NBC cameraman was able to capture footage of the first few seconds of the shooting at the Otter. The five killed at the airstrip were Congressman Ryan; Don Harris, a reporter from NBC; Bob Brown, a cameraman from NBC; San Francisco Examiner photographer Greg Robinson; and Temple member Patricia Parks. Surviving the attack were future Congresswoman Jackie Speier, then a staff member for Ryan; Richard Dwyer, the Deputy Chief of Mission from the U.S. Embassy at Georgetown; Bob Flick, a producer for NBC News; Steve Sung, an NBC sound engineer; Tim Reiterman, a San Francisco Examiner reporter; Ron Javers, a San Francisco Chronicle reporter; Charles Krause, a Washington Post reporter; and several defecting Temple members.

The murder of Congressman Ryan was the only murder of a Congressman in the line of duty in the history of the United States. Deaths in Jonestown

Later that same day, 909 inhabitants of Jonestown, 276 of them children, died of apparent cyanide poisoning, mostly in and around a pavilion.[90] This resulted in the greatest single loss of American civilian life in a non-natural disaster until the September 11, 2001 attacks. No video was taken during the mass suicide, though the FBI did recover a 45 minute audio recording of the suicide in progress.

39 commit suicide. In 1997 a UFO cult, now referred to as Heaven's Gate, came to the desperate conclusion that only by committing mass suicide could it take a giant step toward a new and higher level of existence. The cult came to believe in a link between extra terrestrials, and the attainment of a higher form of existence, and spirituality.

They believed that the coming of the comet Hale Bopp was not only a signal for when they should commit suicide, but that the comet was being followed by a UFO. They also believed that the world would come to an end in the year 2000.

The Spanish Inquisition

The concepts of an inquisition and inquisitorial procedure lie deep in the roots of world history. Inquisitions were used during the decline of the Roman Empire until the Spanish Inquisition's decline in the early 1800s. An inquisition can be run by both civil and church authorities in order to root out non-believers from a nation or religion. The Spanish Inquisition was one of the most deadly inquisitions in history.

Ferdinand and Isabella chose Catholicism to unite Spain and in 1478 asked permission of the pope to begin the Spanish Inquisition to purify the people of Spain. They began by driving out Jews, Protestants and other non-believers.

In 1483 Tomas de Torquemada became the inquisitor-general for most of Spain. He was responsible for establishing the rules of inquisitorial procedure and creating branches of the Inquisition in various cities. He remained the leader of the Spanish Inquisition for fifteen years and is believed to be responsible for the execution of around 2,000 Spaniards. The Catholic Church and the Pope attempted to intervene in the bloody Spanish Inquisition but were unable to wrench the extremely useful political tool from the hands of the Spanish rulers.

An Account of Events in Salem
by Douglas O. Linder (last update: 9/2009)
From June through September of 1692, nineteen men and women, all having been convicted of witchcraft, were carted to Gallows Hill, a barren slope near Salem Village, for hanging. Another man of over eighty years was pressed to death under heavy stones for refusing to submit to a trial on witchcraft charges. Hundreds of others faced accusations of witchcraft; dozens languished in jail for months without trials until the hysteria that swept through Puritan Massachusetts subsided

Aug 9, 1969 - On August 9th, 1969, the infamous Manson "family" began its murderous rampage in Los Angeles, by killing movie. star Sharon Tate and her friends, and later the LaBianca couple. Captured months later, the trial of Manson and his followers became a television and . as well as spawning the best selling true crime book of all time, "Helter Skelter". H

Dec 1969 - It is probably sheer coincidence that it first came out in December 1969, a couple of weeks after a Manson family member began testifying in front of a California grand jury about her part in the Manson Family murders, and life as one of Manson's children and only ...It is probably just my imagination but this song gives me the creeps (or creepy crawlies) for one reason: it reminds me of the Manson Family. It is probably sheer coincidence that it first came out in December 1969, a couple of weeks after a Manson family member began testifying in front of a California grand jury about her part in the Manson Family murders, and life as one of Manson's children and only a couple of weeks after Charlie Manson was revealed as the main suspect of a ...

Dec 9, 1969 - Charles M. Manson, the leader of a nomadic band of young people, and four of his followers were indicted today by the Los Angeles County grand jury for the murder of Sharon Tate, the actress, and four other persons last Aug. 9. The five, along with another member of the band

OBAMA's Cousin on 1500 killed Christians by Muslims.

Raila Odinga did not offer us the name of the 'CATHOLIC FATHER' who gave him that story. The facts are that the massacre was executed in an Assemblies of God church and there was not catholic father in charge of the church. Raila's lies show how far he can go to fabricate a story to justify the massacre of innocent women, children and disabled citizens who were taking refuge in the church.

An Irish Catholic priest in Eldoret, Father Paul Brennan, told Reuters vigilante gangs were roaming the streets. "Houses are being burned. It is too dangerous to go outside and count the dead," he said. "The churches are full. There are four to five thousand in the main cathedral."

The murderers who spoke to the press said,

"The men and women had babies and small children, but they carried pangas to defend themselves. Is someone with a panga innocent? It is not our custom to kill women and children. We told them to come out of the church, but they locked the door and refused to come out. So we burned them."

A third youth spoke. "They were not worshipping in the church. They were hiding. That makes it a cave not a church. Let Kibaki send a plane for the Kikuyus. They can go ... or they will be killed."

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — The mob struck in broad daylight Tuesday, setting fire to the church where hundreds of terrified people had taken refuge. Screams filled the air. Even children were burned alive.
People get excited at soccer games around the world

Eric Holder is a questionable citizen

Bringing Terrorists to New York

1) Costs New Yorkers perhaps 100s of millions for security.
2) Puts New Yorkers at risk as targets.
3) Puts jurists and judges at risk for their whole lives from terrorists.
4) Puts convictions at risk, I don't see how they can even seat a jury.
5) Puts CIA at risk.
6) Puts national security confidentiality at risk.
7) Creates a painful circus for Jihadists to howl about for perhaps years.

Reasons that Eric Holder does this?

1) Run diversion for Obama, thinks all conservatives will get distracted and let up on fighting his programs.
2) Make USA look bad with this circus for 2 years or more.
3) Persecute Bush Administration for Soros and other commies.
2) Knows that after the Malik Hasan episode he can infuriate the USA conservatives this way.

Dont be distracted, while the New York trials are a disaster created by people who hate the USA, it wont change our world. STAY FOCUSED on this disastrous legislature programs geared toward socializing this country, promulgating powerful unions and tremendous bureaucracy.

Health Care alone favors unions and creates hundreds of new agencies.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Obama Pauses to Reflect and other rants

Obama: "Well I have saved you from the BRINK of economic disaster, now we will consider how to save you from the MESS they created and HE caused, ANDY WHO caused the mess? I forget.

The BRINK is defeated


"As I pause to consider the illogical events of loosing jobs while spending one trillion dollars my extended hand of unclenched fingers to business has been chummed so I now without remorse or celebration convene a conference of Jihadists to declare a holy war against loosing jobs.

"Besides praying and whining a lot we will compose a tactic to blame it on THEM and their leader "Whats his name" I cant remember. I now declare a Fatwa against small businesses that refuse to create jobs and have made me look stupid.

"God will cut off their heads and pour hot oil down their throats, just as soon as we convene our "What temperature of hot Oil" conference which will decide if this will contribute to Global Warming, just as soon as our conference on "Do we have enough Oil to Pour down their throats " brings back the answer to that question.

"The "can bio-fuels be poured down their throats" conferences will run consecutively. All conferences will have focus and break out groups as usual include one Maoist and one Marxist in each group.

"The Christian member can sit in the lobby with a sign applauding our efforts, we will convene a conference to compose the sign. What Andy? oh yeah, all signs must be made by union employees. What Andy? Oh yeah, paid up union employees in good standing.

Praise be to God
Sing Children Sing


HEADLINE: Congress passes 25% Kool Aid tax on those top 1% of greedy citizens (who make over $22,000 a year)

The white house today applauded the efforts of congress to balance the kool aid budget. It seems the kool aid has cost about 3200% more than estimated and the rich citizens making $22,000 -$19,000 will be taxed 25%. Yesterday two citizens found to be making more than $22,000 were buried up to their necks and stoned to death on the White House lawn, in a ritualistic glorious event. As usual Fox news has disappointed the administration by reporting this as murder and unconstitutional. (There are rumors that a few citizens at FOX pour their Kool Aid down the toilet) The two offenders slipped through the cracks by trading their Kool aid rations to the Chipawa-Amercan Indians in Michigan for smelt and selling the smelt to rich Mexicans across the border.

In other news, the Chinese have finished there oil rigs off of Los Angeles, they broke there promis to hire Illegal-Alien-Americans and brought 22,000 Uighurs refugies from China to work the rigs. The Chinese will produce 40,000,000,000 barrels a year, the USA will recieve a 2% reduction in it's inerest payments to the Chinese in return.Remember Citizens pouring your Kool Aid down the toilet is a Federal Offense requiring amputation of one limb of your choice. Praise be to God.

Sing children Sing


Fort Hood Texas

As I pause in the task of my communist mopping up of the other guys mess, I ponder the man made disaster at Fort Hood and caution you not to draw any rash conclusions about a man named Nidar Hasad shouting allahu akbar and wonder what mystical meaning there is in that it interrupted my Indian affairs conference where I promised to give them Detroit as it is no longer any use to our non-Indian-American citizens. The Algonquin-Americans get to teach the African-American population of Detroit to fish for Smelt and in other ways honor Gods creations. The Chippewa-Americans will take charge of any Obama stash left in Detroit. I have scheduled a academic conference to prepare the educational agenda to teach fishing to 700,000 African-Americans left in Detroit. This will be done by the 22 Algonquin-Americans left. in the world I am asking the Annenberg Foundation that exists to advance the public well-being through improved communication for 100 million grant for each of the Algonquin-Americans because that worked out so well in Chicago didnt it Bill? We have also provided funding so everyone in Detroit can win the National Honorable Fishing Award, which will be administered by SEIU and available only to union members. What Andy? Oh Yeah that's paid up union members in good standing.


I extend to you the fist of broken fingers, even tho the socialist mop is heavy and my bucket is full of dirty water I can thank God I avoided the pain of amputation and I still have my tonsils, even tho my insurer cut my max to $5,000,000 the day after I removed their legal protection I continue without malice to trash whoever opposes my winning of the race during which I beat an old white man and a middle aged white woman whom I never noticed they had any skin color because she was like my typical white person grandmother who I love. Sing children sing.

Obama pauses to reflect while sipping a vodka martini with white house visitor Andy Stern

Obama: Well Andy the folks are finally going to be taken care of.

Andy: Dues, Dues I told you make them pay dues.

Obama: After 35 focus groups and 22 breakouts and 100's of discussions they are finally going to do what you told them, Andy.

Andy: Dues, Dues I told you make them pay dues.

Obama: Andy, not now, I'm pausing to reflect. It was an ingenious plan Nancy came up with. Our polls show 22.5% of the conservatives will refuse to join a Public Option and we will fine them $25,000 to pay for the plan. Gitano bay Cuba will be empty and we will ship them there. I was told it costs $82,000 a year in Gitano to keep a prisoner so we will make up the shortfall by having the Chipawa-Americans teach them to fish for Smelt. Our committee on "Fishing For Smelt At Gitano bay By Conservatives Who Wont Buy Public Option" FFSAGBBCWWBP reported that we can generate a profit of $56,999 per conservative which will reduce the national debt by $1.

Andy: They have to be unionized, cant fish without paying dues. What about the liberals who dont buy in.

Obama: You cant teach a liberal to fish, besides they dont want to work.

Andy: They wouldnt have to work just join the union and pay dues.